Many conferences have some sort of awards for “Best student poster.” But John Vanek recently noted something I pointed out early on in this blog: the winners are often not very good looking posters.
Pet peeve: when posters that are simply walls of text win best poster awards, despite all the advice that stresses not to do that.
This is not surprising. I’ve judged many presentations, and there is always some sort of scoring sheet to guide the judges. Those scoring schemes always weight the content of the presentation (whether poster or talk) more heavily than the visual excellence of the presentation.
Hey, conference organizers: be like the Oscars. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences recognize that there are many components to making movies. These all deserve to be recognized. So they have the main Oscars, and a separate ceremony for scientific and technical awards.If you are going to judge poster presentations, make two awards.
- Give one award purely for the scientific content of the poster. Does it have a clear hypothesis, appropriate controls, important finding, and so one.
- Give one award purely for the visual excellence of the poster. I already have a checklist ready for judges!
The problem would be getting people to get past the idea that an award for graphic design at an academic conference is like the “Miss Congeniality” award at a beauty pageant. Yes, it’s an award, but not the one that people are there to win and that isn’t taken seriously.Related posts
The Better Posters checklist
Posts
1 comment:
I always go to poster sessions looking out for the best-designed posters. They're meant for communication; content is secondary to my mind. Such a disappointment most poster judges fail to see that :(
Post a Comment