The case against logos
People care as much about your university’s logo on your poster as much as they care about the logos on this:
Which is to say, not at all.
Logos on the car do not interfere with the car’s ability to drive. Unfortunately, logos on a poster can interfere with the poster’s ability to communicate. If people try to put too much stuff on posters (which everyone falls prey to), logos chew up vital space in a situation where every square centimeter counts.
This issue is one that slide presenters face all the time. Here’s what some smart people have to say about logos on PowerPoint presentations.
Garr Reynolds asked, “Who says we need our logo on every slide?” on his Presentation Zen blog:
If you are presenting for an organization try removing logos (and other clutter) from all except the first and last slide. If you want people to learn something and remember you, then make a good, honest presentation. The logo won’t help make a sell or make a point, but the clutter it brings does add unnecessary noise and makes the presentation visuals look like a commercial. And people hate commercials or being sold to.
I’ve added the emphasis. There are some similar sentiments on page 129 of his book Presentation Zen:
Slide real estate is limited as it is, so don’t clutter it with logos and trademarks, footers, and so on.
This is even more true in a poster. You can have an indefinite number of PowerPoint slides, but you have only one piece of paper for a poster.
Nancy Duarte wrote about logos in Slide:ology (page 117, for those following along at home):
Where does it say that every slide needs a logo? The people who have come to hear you speak most likely know who you work for. ...
Two of my pet peeves are people who include their logo on every slide, and that animated paper clip in the Microsoft Office product suite.
Speaking of Microsoft, they took Colin Purrington’s Advice on Designing Scientific Posters and put it on the official page for Microsoft Office). Colin on logos (my emphasis):
Institutional logos are great on departmental letterhead and college athletic caps, but are really rather obnoxious on posters. This is because your institution's name is already on the poster in the address below the title, and thus the logo adds absolutely nothing except recognizable branding.
Except that, in most cases, the logo doesn’t even add recognizable branding. As Seth Godin noted, the logos of many major companies are interchangeable. If you look at many university logos, the sameness is palpable.
Circles are popular:
Shields, no longer serving any practical purpose in battle, continue to work well in logo design:
Some logos designers are apparently frustrated architects, and like to feature buildings:
Then you have the typography purists, using mainly words – and the occasional horizontal line for that extra classy touch:
I pick these not because they are bad logos; they’re not. I pick these to show that when you’re faced with tens, hundreds, or even thousands of these at a conference, your logo is not as distinctive as you think.
Logos acquire meaning through repeated association. A mermaid has nothing to do with coffee, except at Starbucks. This means that your logo is most likely to be effective at a small regional meeting, where people know your institution. At a big national meeting with thousands of posters (where people are most likely to insist on “promoting their brand,” because they don’t understand the difference between a brand and a logo), it’s most likely pointless.
Some people noted that their institutions have a template for posters that include logos. Institutional templates can be helpful, if they were done by a professional designer. Templates bring benefit of consistency, which can be attractive and bring cohesion if you have multiple posters.
Consider the problems when you have a project with many participating institutions, and each demands their own logo space. The likelihood that the logos will have complementary colours or shapes is almost zero:
The madness has to stop now, or this will be the conference poster of the future:
The actual scientific content will be accessed by a QR code in the bottom, linking to a PDF of the research.
How to use logos
If you want or need to include logos (i.e., your boss makes you), here’s how to do it right.
Here is how I often see logos used. I call them “logo bookends.”
These poor logos are squashed, misaligned, pixelated, and they’re drawing attention to all these faults thanks to the white box around them.
It’s an easy to see how this happens. People center titles because they think centring looks classy. This leaves space on either side, and people think that every blank space has to be filled. They look for a logo, grab the first thing they can find off their university’s web page, and stick them in the corners. The logos are the wrong shape, so people resize them without paying attention to their original proportions.
Understandable, but still sloppy.
Make sure your logos, like all your images, are high resolution. Do not grab images that are only a hundred pixels wide from your institution’s home page and blow them to several inches across. Find out where the publication quality versions are; it will often be something like your institution’s public relations or university relations office. Institutions and funding agencies often have the high-resolution logos available on their websites in several formats. For instance, the National Science Foundation has several versions of their logo and guidelines for its use. The National Institutes of Health have something similar.
Make sure that circles stay circular. If you’re using PowerPoint, I have a guide that describes how PowerPoint tends to distort images and how to fix them.
If you have a coloured background, take the time to make the logo transparent. This means will often mean converting from JPG to PNG. Better still if you can find a vector-based image.
Alternately, a plain white background is less likely to run you into problems. I’ll use those as examples from here on.
Here’s another variation on the logo bookends. This one is favoured by people who want the logos to take up as much space as possible:
For goodness’ sake, don’t repeat logos. The redundancy (affiliation shown twice with the logos, once with the text) is pointless. Here, the multiple logos forces a one-line title to spread over two lines, taking up valuable space where the results and data could be. Again, the distortion of what is obviously a circle shows carelessness.
Here are a couple of alternatives if someone insists you use the logo. First, you may find a home for the logo at the bottom:
Colin Purrington favours this placement (from Advice on Designing Scientific Posters and Microsoft Office’s PowerPoint page):
But if you are somehow genetically predispositioned to use logos on your poster, make sure that they are small (1” for maximum dimension) and corralled into the Acknowledgement section along with, perhaps, logos of funding organizations. E.g., never, ever put a logo at the top of your poster.
Nancy Duarte is talking about slides here, but the point is similar. On Slide:ology (page 117):
(I)f your boss insists you put the logo on every slide, the lower right is the best place for it because you can wrap the right rag of text around it. After all, the same box who wants the logo on every slide probably has so much text to shoehorn in, you need to wrap it.
This is also true of posters, following the Cosmo Principle: the top left is the most valuable spot, and the bottom right is the least valuable spot. Logos can serve to even out some unused spaces on the bottom of posters. I did this on one of my own favourite posters. It’s one thing that the poster pictured at right did correctly.
Another option is to break away from centering your title. By using standard left alignment, you can often create enough white space where the logo can live unobtrusively:
Many logos come in alternate colours and shapes. For instance, my university’s logo comes in full colour, a version using either of the logo’s two primary colours, and black and white. And there are both vertical and horizontal versions, too. Here, for instance, is a poster made with the demo version of PosterGenius (reviewed here; the data was published in Nasir and Faulkes 2011):
This poster has the advantage of a short title, which means there is lots of space between the text and the logo in the upper right. The logo is a complementary colour to the rest of the poster background. It’s there, but it doesn’t fight with the rest of the poster. Now see what would have happened if I had used a different institutional logo:
Now the logo is competing for attention with the rest of the poster, largely because the greens are contrasting with the more neutral background. (I should say that I replaced the logo with a graphics editor. It probably wouldn’t be as large if I’d put it in with PosterGenius.)
As someone who likes graphics, I love logos and appreciate the skill that goes into making them. But I have seen them used so badly, so often on posters that for most people, this is the best option for logos:
None at all.
Poster real estate
Learning from Cosmo
Presentation Zen: Who says we need our logo on every slide?
Seth’s Blog: But you’re not saying anything, Logos, Your brand is not your logo
Nasir U, Faulkes Z. 2011. Color polymorphism of sand crabs, Lepidopa benedicti (Decapoda, Albuneidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 31(2): 240-245. DOI: 10.1651/10-3356.1
NASCAR car photo by by Darryl W. Moran Photography on Flickr; logo party photo by tantek on Flickr; both used under a Creative Commons license.