The posters up for the National Science Foundation’s annual Vizzie awards make for an interesting gallery. Some nice work there! Vote for your favourite!
Every panel in the figure above shows the same data. It’s a nice example of the choices you have to make in the design process, from Rousselet and colleagues. They are also the latest to fire salvos against bar graphs, with neuroscience being their main target:
Unfortunately, graphical representations in many scientific journals, including neuroscience journals, tend to hide underlying distributions, with their excessive use of line and bar graphs.
Your colleagues in Human Resources are making posters, too. Check this guide for making posters for Human Resources procedures.
I disagree with the final advice of, “Start with a template,” though. To me, that leaves too many decisions in the hands of other people, and they may not be good ones. How many below par PowerPoint decks have we sat through because people just grabbed whatever template was there?
Hat tip to Sarah McGuire.
I’ve been on a social media diet, so I don’t have as many poster related goods from Neuroscience 2016 as I sometimes do. But:
Fabric posters still don’t look as sharp as paper, according to Anne Martin:
I’ve yet to see a fabric poster that isn’t fairly wrinkled.
Elizabeth Sandquist gave us this haunting image of a poster graveyard:
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment