I often use highways signs as metaphors for conference posters. This article describes the typeface selection for highways signs in the United States, and the decision to return to an older (possibly inferior) typeface. Hat tip to Amanda Krauss.
Speaking of highways signs, here’s how they might look if designed by academics:
Photo from Dan Taber at the recent AAAS meeting. Hat tip to Jamie Vernon.
The National Science Foundation has announced the winners of the annual visualization challenge, the Vizzies.
There are some nice ones there. I think this baldderwort image is close to the sweet spot for an academic conference poster.
What is it about pie charts that bring out the worst in design?
Vice magazine should know better than to make the thing above. Hat tip to Arthur Charpentier and Dawn Bazely.
Lenny Teytelman caught this rebellious moment:
There’s a longer post about the often confusing social media policies of research conferences here.
I just learned of Jane Richardson, who created a now standard way of drawing protein structure. Computers do it now, but her hand drawings are so lovely:
It’s a lovely example of how you have to think deeply about something to create a good graphic, but that good graphic can clarify so much for so many. Here’s a blog post and an interview with Richardson. She says:
Producing a good image is always a lot of work, making a single illustration that shows a point really well is always a challenge.
I still have to review Ellen Lupton’s How Posters Work, darn it. Meanwhile, here’s a summary of the book.
A list of logos that make good use of negative space. I do hope the UTRGV Vaquero starts making those lists one day.