Maybe a better model are kid’s books.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eda4/7eda43d13a8d6e41e5e9de8324c3fa368c544915" alt=""
Now, before you go and accuse me of trying to dumb down your brilliant research, faithful reader, let me say that this is an analogy. It is meant to highlight a few key points, not provide a perfect “one to one” match between an tool for academic discussion and books for lulling a young one into sleepytime.
Think of it as adapting your full academic work for a young reader.
As a kid, somewhere along the way I got an illustrated version of Moby Dick. The original, of course, is proper literature. It’s all words. High art. (I use Neil Gaiman’s criteria for determining this: A book is a work of art if it is large enough to stun a burglar.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/740af/740aff9a3ff0bc66e67857e7e8f368d1b44b4fdb" alt=""
Moby Dick can be a thick tome that entrances American Literature professors while simultaneously boring undergraduate students, or, it can be an “Boy’s Own” yarn that makes young boys want to go to sea.
Your technical, peer-reviewed paper of your work will always be there for other professors. Make the poster version of your work the adventure tale.
Related posts
Don’t hold my hand, which discusses comics
7J9PWAN4Z5Q2
No comments:
Post a Comment