tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1481277762471114452.post8613228488796001627..comments2024-03-20T12:56:48.451-05:00Comments on Better Posters: Using bad design to make a good pointZen Faulkeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07811309183398223358noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1481277762471114452.post-50995239711427043802015-12-19T09:45:56.038-06:002015-12-19T09:45:56.038-06:00Have to agree with you, he is missing one of the p...Have to agree with you, he is missing one of the points about a publication list, in that you might actually want to find it some day. As you say, if you only provide a DOI weblink, it's sort of impossible to find unless you actually get the DOI correct. Unlike 'hmm, it was author "x" in "journal of yy", maybe in 2014...' which allows you to narrow it down if you need to find it later. Especially if you remember some keyword and the journal, rather than an author.<br /><br />In fact, much of this exercise about excluding the journal title, appears to me to be more of a show off 'Look at what I'm doing!!!' spectacle rather than really trying to help out. As somebody pointed out tongue in cheek, perhaps removing the author names would be an even more useful tool, since many people associate certain authors with quality that may or may not be accurate for a given paper. Mark Gurwellnoreply@blogger.com