tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1481277762471114452.post5957747506426347867..comments2024-03-20T12:56:48.451-05:00Comments on Better Posters: Link roundup, August 2011Zen Faulkeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07811309183398223358noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1481277762471114452.post-51602860928709047622011-08-04T10:51:33.267-05:002011-08-04T10:51:33.267-05:00re: poster judging, I think while she says that th...re: poster judging, I think while she says that the content should be the only criterion, I can't help but think that HOW that content is presented is going to have an influence as well (she admits as much in the next sentence).<br /><br />Of course, how well a poster is designed (at least IMO) has more of an impact on the casual reader rather than a poster judge. Why? Because the judge is more likely to have the presenter there to talk through the data. Aside from the most abysmally designed poster, I can usually figure out what's going on if the author is there to present and answer questions ("wait...what's this graph showing again?" hints at poor design, but is usually something that can be explained).Carl Wondershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17006223152242187007noreply@blogger.com